2023 Soybean Microbial Product Trials
Three microbial seed treatments (Table 1) plus a non-treated control were installed at each location in a randomized plot design (4 x 20 ft rows with 15” row spaces) with 4 replicates per treatment. Product application rates followed manufacturer’s instructions, with a total application volume of 5 fluid oz/100 lbs of seed (volume adjusted with DI water). Seeds were planted within 5 days of treatment. We treated two soybeans varieties: Asgrow Bayer Crop Sciences AG52XF0 (MG 5.2) and AG59XF0 (MG 6.1) which are XF/SR (trait) and pre-treated with Acceleron Fungicide and Insecticide.
Table 1. Microbial seed treatment label information. *Microbial species are bacterial unless indicated as fungal (F). **Stabilize RZ is recommended as a soil amendment/in-furrow application, and the seed application in this study is exploratory. cfu = colony-forming units, vp = viable propagules
| Product | Company | Formulation* | Storage | Application Rate |
| EndoShield ST | JABB of the Carolinas | 1% Beauveria bassianaF (min 1x108 cfu/ml), 99% adjuvant | Store below 90 ˚F out of direct sunlight | 1 fl. oz per 100 lbs seed |
| Vault IP Plus | BASF Corporation | Component A: 3.132% Bacillus amyloliquefaciens MBl600 (1.4x1010 CFU/ml), 1.706% Bacillus subtilis strain BU1814 (1.4x109 cfu/ml), 50-60% glycerol; Component B: 100% Bradyrhizobium japonicum (1.0x1010 cfu/ml) | Store at 35-86 ˚F, keep away from heat and direct sunlight | 0.1 fl. oz Component A and 1 fl. oz Component B per 100 lbs seed |
| Stabilize RZ | Coastal Agrobusiness | <1% Brevibacillus spp. and Bacillus spp. (2.5x109 cfu/ml); Glomus spp.F (48 vp/ml) | Room temperature | 1 pint/acre as soil amendment; 2.5 fl. oz per 100 lbs seed for this study** |
Results
Soybean yield differs significantly (P<0.001) between locations (Beaufort=67 bu/acre, Sampson=90.5 bu/acre and Union 73.3 bu/acre on average) (Figure 1, Table 2). Within each location, yield differs significantly (P<0.03) between maturity groups (Figure 2). Yield does not differ between microbial seed treatments. There are no significant differences in yield between microbial treatments and non-treated controls within each location and maturity group.
Table 2. Soybean yield (bu/acre) per location averaged across 4 plot replicates for varieties AG52XF0 (MG5.2)/AG59XF0 (MG 6.1). NA was due to combine error.
| Microbial Treatment | Beaufort | Sampson | Union |
| EndoShield ST | 83.0/50.9 | 87.1/88.1 | 67.0/81.3 |
| Vault IP Plus | 75.8/63.4 | 90.0/96.3 | 63.9/77.7 |
| Stabilize RZ | 69.1/51.9 | 85.1/93.6 | 70.6/78.6 |
| Non-treated | 84.8/NA | 87.2/96.7 | 68.9/78.7 |
Leaf macronutrients at early growth stage (V4-V5) differed between Beaufort and Sampson locations for nitrogen (P<0.001) and phosphorus (P=0.065) but not potassium (Figure 3, Table 3). Leaf nutrients did not differ between maturity group or microbial treatment.
Table 3. Leaf macronutrients (nitrogen-N, phosphorus-P, potassium-K) measured at soybean early developmental stage (approximately V4-V5) in the most recent mature leaves by NCDA&CS. Union samples were compromised due to heavy rain at collection date.
| Location | MG | Treatment | N (%) | P (%) | K (%) |
| Beaufort | 5.2 | EndoShield ST | 4.84 | 0.38 | 3.18 |
| Vault IP Plus | 4.18 | 0.29 | 3.17 | ||
| Stabilize RZ | 3.95 | 0.3 | 3.04 | ||
| Non-treated | 4.30 | 0.35 | 3.15 | ||
| 6.1 | EndoShield ST | 4.67 | 0.29 | 2.73 | |
| Vault IP Plus | 4.6 | 0.29 | 2.7 | ||
| Stabilize RZ | 4.17 | 0.32 | 3.43 | ||
| Non-treated | 4.45 | 0.33 | 3.28 | ||
| Sampson | 5.2 | EndoShield ST | 6.08 | 0.3 | 2.62 |
| Vault IP Plus | 5.75 | 0.42 | 2.75 | ||
| Stabilize RZ | 5.49 | 0.37 | 2.71 | ||
| Non-treated | 5.19 | 0.5 | 4.58 | ||
| 6.1 | EndoShield ST | 5.53 | 0.39 | 2.68 | |
| Vault IP Plus | 5.34 | 0.31 | 2.74 | ||
| Stabilize RZ | 5.52 | 0.36 | 2.61 | ||
| Non-treated | 5.21 | 0.32 | 2.96 |
Summary
- Soybean yield varies between locations. Within locations, yield differs between maturity groups. Yield patterns are consistent with NC State 2023 Soybean OVT yield comparisons.
- Microbial biostimulant seed treatments did not influence yield (or early development leaf nutrients). There was no difference in yield between microbial treatments and non-treated controls.
- Yield values within treatments (including non-treated controls) tend to have a large range or spread. For these small plot trials, a significant difference would require consistent and large increase in yield between treatment and control.
- Environmental variables between production environments drives differences in field performance and soybean yield. These variables may include weather, soil biogeochemistry, and differences in soil microbiome diversity.
Appendix
Supplementary Table 1. Soil chemical and physical characteristics at planting (data from NCDA&CS and NC State EATS Laboratory). Cultural practices and weather data from NC State OVT Soybean 2023 Supporting Data.
| Location | Beaufort | Sampson | Union |
| Soil Description | Organic | Loamy Sand | Silt Loam |
| Prior Crop | Wheat | Corn | Cotton |
| HM (%) | 8.24 | 2.68 | 0.41 |
| W/V (g/cm3) | 0.97 | 1.09 | 0.76 |
| CEC (meq/100 cm3) | 11.5 | 8.7 | 16.7 |
| BS (%) | 60 | 77 | 97 |
| Ac | 4.6 | 2.0 | 0.5 |
| pH | 5.0 | 5.8 | 7.2 |
| Na (mg/dm3) | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| P (mg/dm3) | 80 | 161 | 535 |
| K (mg/dm3) | 87 | 254 | 280 |
| Ca (mg/dm3) | 1093 | 932 | 2945 |
| Mg (mg/dm3) | 153 | 173 | 96 |
| S (mg/dm3) | 12 | 15 | 25 |
| Mn (mg/dm3) | 6.2 | 6.0 | 34.7 |
| Cu (mg/dm3) | 2.4 | 1.4 | 2.7 |
| Zn (mg/dm3) | 14.1 | 4.7 | 13.7 |
| Total C (%) | 7.77 | 2.95 | 4.05 |
| Total N (%) | 0.27 | 0.17 | 0.35 |
| Total Rainfall (in) | 20.98 | 22.8 | 17.12 |
| Ave High Temp (˚ F) | 81.0 | 82.3 | 82.8 |
| Planting Date | 5/12/2023 | 5/13/2023 | 5/10/2023 |
| Harvest Date | 11/8/2023 | 11/6/2023 | 10/25/2023 |
| Population | 190,000 | 145,000 | 145,000 |
Supplementary Figure 1. Full season weather data across locations. Data from NC State OVT Soybean 2023 Supporting Data.
2023-Soybean-Weather-data